The 1st-century Imminence of the Second Coming; the Uncertainty of its Precise "Day and Hour"

The 1st-century Imminence of the Second Coming; the Uncertainty of its Precise "Day and Hour"

Below is the 41st of multiple excerpts from Parts I and II of The Parousia, the late 19th-century masterpiece on the Second Coming by James Stuart Russell. The initial 31 posts on this blog deal with the Book of Revelation, which is cogently interpreted in Part III of Russell's magnum opus. (For all blog posts, see russellparousia.blogspot.com)
"Certainty of the consummation, yet uncertainty of its precise date. [Matt. 24:36: 'But of that day and hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels of heaven, but my Father only.' [Mark 13:32: 'But of that day and that hour knoweth no man, no, not the angels which are in heaven, neither the Son, but the Father.'] "Although our Lord has defined the limits of the time within which the predicted consummation would take place [see verses below this excerpt], yet a certain amount of indefiniteness remains respecting the moment of its arrival. He does not specify the exact date, the 'hour, or the day,' or even the month or the year. This does not mean that the whole question of time is left unsettled: it refers merely to the precise date. The consummation [i.e., the Second Coming and its accompanying events] was to fall within the term of the existing generation, but the particular hour when the knell of doom should sound [over 1st-century Israel, as foreshadowed in Matt. 23:34-36, 23:37-39, 24:1-3; Mark 13:1-4; Luke 11:49-51, 13:34-35, 19:41-44, 21:5-7, 21:20] was not revealed to man, nor angel, nor (what is stranger still) to the Son of man Himself. It was the secret which the Father kept 'in His own power.' There were doubtless sufficient reasons for this reserve. To have specified 'the day and the hour'---to have said, 'In the seven-and-thirtieth year, in the sixth month and the eighth day of the month, the city shall be taken and the temple burnt with fire' [which the 1st-century Jewish historian Josephus records occurred in A.D. 70]---would not only have been inconsistent with the manner of prophecy [of the New Testament, which was completed before A.D. 70], but would have taken away one of the strongest inducements to constant watchfulness and prayer---the uncertainty of the precise time." ----- Prophecies that the Second Coming Would Occur Within the Disciples' Lifetime and Within that of Jesus’ Own Generation Matthew 10:23 [Jesus to the disciples] “...truly, I say to you, you will not have gone through all the towns of Israel before the Son of Man comes.” Matt 16:28 [Jesus to the disciples] “Truly, I say to you, there are some standing here who will not taste death until they see the Son of Man coming in his kingdom.” (Parallels at Mark 9:1 and Luke 9:27) Matt 24:34 [Jesus to the disciples]“Truly, I say to you, this generation [Greek: genea haute] will not pass away until all these things take place.” (Parallels at Mark 13:30 and Luke 21:32) Matt 26:64 [Jesus to Caiaphas the high priest and the Sanhedrin] “...you will see the Son of Man seated at the right hand of Power and coming on the clouds of heaven.” (Parallels at Mark 14:62 and Luke 22:69) Revelation 1:7 [John to the seven churches in Asia] “Behold, he is coming with the clouds, and every eye will see him, even those who pierced him…” (English Standard Version) Other relevant verses: "END OF THE [OLD COVENANT] AGE": Matt 13:40, 13:49, 24:3, 28:20; 1 Corin 10:11; Hebrews 9:26 "THE END" [OF THE OLD COVENANT AGE]: Matt 10:22, 24:6, 24:13, 24:14; Mark 13:7, 13:13; Luke 21:9; 1 Corin 1:8, 15:24; Hebrews 3:14, 6:11; 1 Peter 4:7; Rev 2:26 LAST TIME/S: 1 Peter 1:5, 1:20; Jude 18
For further reading: Rethinking the Dates of the New Testament by Jonathan Bernier (2022)

Redating the New Testament by John A.T. Robinson (1976)

Before Jerusalem Fell: Dating the Book of Revelation by Kenneth L. Gentry, Jr. (1989)

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Book of Revelation: Written to be Understood by its Original 1st-century Readers

Below is the first of multiple excerpts of commentary on the Book of Revelation from   The Parousia ,  the late 19th-century masterpiece on the Second Coming by James Stuart Russell: " We come now to the consideration of the most difficult and obscure part of divine Revelation, and we may well pause on the threshold of a region so shrouded in mystery and darkness . The conspicuous failures of the wise and learned men who have too confidently professed to decipher the mystic scroll of the apocalyptic Seer [John] warn us against presumption. We might even feel justified in declining altogether a task which has baffled so many of the ablest and best interpreters of the Word of God.  But, on the other hand ,   do we honour the book by refusing to open it, and pronouncing it hopelessly obscure ? Are we justified in so treating any portion of the Revelation which God has given us? Is the book to be virtually handed over to diviners and charlatans, to be the sport of the...
Read more

Revelation's Messages to the Seven 1st-century Churches of Asia Minor

Below is the ninth of multiple excerpts of commentary on the Book of Revelation from The Parousia , the late 19th-century masterpiece on the Second Coming by James Stuart Russell: " The First Vision "THE MESSAGES TO THE SEVEN CHURCHES.  "[Rev.] Chap. i. 10-20; ii. iii [Rev. 1:10-20; 2, 3] "Notwithstanding what has been said respecting the imagery and symbolism of the Apocalypse [Book of Revelation],  it is not to be forgotten that underlying these symbols there is everywhere a substratum of fact and reality. We have only to read the messages to the seven churches to discover that we are in a region of actual fact and intense reality.  There is such individuality of character in the graphic delineations of the spiritual state of the several churches, that  we cannot doubt that they are accurate and truthful portraits of the Christian communities [in 1st-century Asia Minor] which they describe . There is indeed a strange commingling of figure [symbol] and fact [in ...
Read more

The Identity of Revelation's "Babylon," part 1

Below is the 29th of multiple excerpts of commentary on the Book of Revelation from The Parousia, the late 19th-century masterpiece on the Second Coming by James Stuart Russell.  In this excerpt, Russell begins his explanation of why Revelation's "Babylon" represents 1st-century Jerusalem, not Rome.  The Identity of Revelation's "Babylon," part 1 "The Sixth Vision "THE HARLOT CITY , [Rev.] Chaps. xvii. [17] xviii. [18] xix. [19] xx. [20] " We now approach a part of our investigation in which we are about to make great demands upon the candour and impartiality of the reader, and must ask for a patient and unbiased weighing of the evidence that shall be brought before him. Possibly we may run counter to many prepossessions, but if the seat of judgment be occupied by an impartial love of truth, we do not fear an adverse decision. " It may be convenient at the outset to take a general view of this vision as a whole , occupying as it doe...
Read more