SecondComingAD70

The pre-A.D. 70 Date of Revelation's Composition (Part 2) Below is the fourth of multiple excerpts of commentary on the Book of Revelation from   The   Parousia , the late 19th-century masterpiece on the Second Coming by James Stuart Russell. [In this excerpt, Russell continues his enumeration of internal evidence that the Book of Revelation was written before A.D. 70, when Jerusalem and the Temple were destroyed by the Romans.  See previous post for Russell's first point of evidence.] "2.  After the fullest consideration of the remarkable [Greek] expression  te kuriake hemera ( the Lord’s day), in Rev. i. 10  [Rev. 1:10] , we are satisfied that it cannot refer to the first day of the week, but that those interpreters are right who understand it to refer to the period called elsewhere  ‘the [great judgment] day of the Lord. ’  There is no example in the New Testament of the first day of the week (Sunday) being called ‘the Lord’s day,’ or ‘the day ...

The pre-A.D. 70 Date of Revelation's Co mposition   (Part 1) Below is the third of multiple excerpts of commentary on the Book of Revelation from   The   Parousia , the late 19th-century masterpiece on the Second Coming by James Stuart Russell: " DATE OF THE APOCALYPSE [BOOK OF REVELATION]. " If the foregoing conclusions [about the speedy coming of the Lord] are well founded, they virtually decide the much-debated questions respecting the date of the Apocalypse  [Revelation].  Perhaps it may be admitted that the weight of authority [i.e., tradition], such as it is, inclines to the side of the late date: that is, that it was written after the destruction of Jerusalem [i.e., after A.D. 70]; but   the  internal evidence  seems to us overwhelming on the side of its early date [i.e., before A.D. 70] .  That the Apocalypse contemplates the Parousia [Second Coming] as imminent is surely an incontrovertible proposition .  That the Parousia is al...

Time Limits Set by the Book of Revelation* Below is the second of multiple excerpts of commentary on the Book of Revelation from   The   Parousia , the late 19th-century masterpiece on the Second Coming by James Stuart Russell:  " LIMITATION OF TIME IN THE APOCALYPSE [BOOK OF REVELATION] .  " This [time limit] is not a mere conjecture, it is certified by the express statements of the book [Rev. 1:1, 1:3, 1:7, 1:19, 3:11, 16:15, 22:6, 22:7, 22:10, 22:12, 22:20].  If there be one thing which more than any other is explicitly and repeatedly affirmed in the Apocalypse it is the  nearness   of the events which it predicts. This is stated, and reiterated again and again, in the beginning, the middle, and the end. We are warned that ‘the time is  at hand ;’ ‘These things must  shortly   come to pass,’ ‘Behold, I come  quickly ;’ ‘Surely I come  quickly .’  Yet, in the face of these express and oft-repeated declarations ...

Book of Revelation: Written to be Understood by its Original 1st-Century Readers Below is the first of multiple excerpts of commentary on the Book of Revelation from   The   Parousia ,  the late 19th-century masterpiece on the Second Coming by James Stuart Russell:   " We come now to the consideration of the most difficult and obscure part of divine Revelation, and we may well pause on the threshold of a region so shrouded in mystery and darkness .  The conspicuous failures of the wise and learned men who have too confidently professed to decipher the mystic scroll of the apocalyptic Seer [John] warn us against presumption.  We might even feel justified in declining altogether a task which has baffled so many of the ablest and best interpreters of the Word of God.  But, on the other hand ,   do we honour the book by refusing to open it, and pronouncing it hopelessly obscure ? Are we justified in so treating any portion of the Revelation which...

THE 1st-CENTURY RAPTURE (SNATCHING AWAY) OF LIVING SAINTS Below is the text of a 4-page leaflet written by James Stuart Russell, author of the late 19th-century masterpiece The Parousia: The New Testament Doctrine of Our Lord’s Second Coming . The authorship of the pamphlet, published anonymously before 1895, was identified through meticulous research by Mateus Fonseca Souza. The document is housed at Brigham Young University and can be accessed on the Internet ( https:// archive.org/details/therap tureofsain697engl … ). Text placed in brackets [such as this] has been added for clarity by the editor of this blog ( http:// russellparousia.blogspot.com ). Text placed in bold reflects the emphasis of the blog editor. -------------------- Leaflet No. [no number given] "The Rapture of the Saints." "Then, we that are alive, that are left; shall together with them (the dead in Christ) be caught up in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air, &c.” — I. THESS. IV., 1...

  Jerusalem's Fall in A.D. 70: An Event that Signified Christ's Second Coming Below is the 42nd of multiple excerpts from Parts I and II of The Parousia , the late 19th-century masterpiece on the Second Coming by James Stuart Russell. The initial 31 posts on this blog deal with the Book of Revelation, which is cogently interpreted in Part III of Russell's magnum opus. (For all blog posts, see russellparousia.blogspot.com) [In previous excerpts, posted at the Parousia blog, Russell has painstakingly shown that an imminent, 1st-century Second Coming was a belief central to Christ's own prophecies and to the teachings of the apostles in the New Testament's epistles and the Book of Revelation. [Russell deals with three key questions in this excerpt: (1) Were Christ and the apostles deluded about the timing of the Second Coming and did God permit this to keep Christians in a state of constant vigilance? (2) Was the destruction of Jerusalem and the Temple in A.D. 70...